Engine C — Validation
Engine C is not yet a final engine. The long side has completed walk-forward validation; the short side remains in research. WFA results for the long side are published here.
Validation Status
Long side
Validated
C1–C4 OOS slices
Short side
In research
Not yet published
External evaluation
Live
FTMO Swing 2-Step · began 29 Jul 2026
Unlike Engines A and B, C has not completed a formal engine-wide validation review. The long-side WFA, full-window configuration and stress test are published here; the short side remains in research.
Walk-Forward Timeline (Long Side)
Four rolling slices. Periods below are read from the long-side WFA slices; OOS results are reported at the slice level, not the engine level.
| Slice | IS Period | OOS Period | OOS Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | 19/01/2014 - 01/01/2019 | 01/01/2019 - 01/01/2021 | Breakeven · PF 1.00 |
| C2 | 01/01/2016 - 01/01/2021 | 01/01/2021 - 01/01/2023 | Profitable · PF 1.56 |
| C3 | 01/01/2018 - 01/01/2023 | 01/01/2023 - 01/01/2025 | Profitable · PF 1.33 |
| C4 | 01/01/2019 - 01/01/2024 | 01/01/2024 - 01/01/2026 | Profitable · PF 1.64 |
C1 OOS is breakeven on profit factor — a weak slice. C2–C4 are profitable out-of-sample. Together with the full-window production configuration and stress testing below, these slices form the validation basis for C longs.
Engine C Walk-Forward Slices
| Sample (IS/OOS) | Win Rate | Profit Factor | Sharpe | DD max | Trades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In-Sample | 30.1% | 1.47 | 2.40 | 13.8% | 461 |
| Out-of-Sample | 27.0% | 1.00 | 0.19 | 26.0% | 185 |
Behavioral Structure
IS
1.31
OOS
-1.31
IS
87.0%
OOS
91.4%
Drawdown Stress
IS
5.50
OOS
11.87
Performance Stability
| Metric | Mean | StDev | CV | Min / Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profit Factor (OOS) | 1.38 | 0.25 | 0.180 | 1.00 / 1.64 |
| Sharpe (OOS) | 1.95 | 1.10 | 0.563 | 0.19 / 3.00 |
| Max DD % (OOS) | 19.13% | 3.99% | 0.208 | 15.94% / 25.96% |
Structural Stability
| Metric | Mean | StDev | CV | Min / Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Runs Z (OOS) | -0.21 | 1.12 | 5.402 | -1.31 / 1.24 |
| Ulcer Index (OOS) | 8.15 | 2.16 | 0.265 | 6.63 / 11.87 |
| Percent Time Below High (OOS) | 89.10% | 2.30% | 0.026 | 86.75% / 91.44% |
Monte Carlo Stress Test
Full-Window Long Configuration
Simulations use validated long-side trade returns only, bootstrap-resampled with replacement to produce 10,000 equity paths to estimate variability in cumulative returns and drawdown distribution.
Results reflect resampled historical trade returns under the same position sizing model and are not forecasts of future performance. Bootstrap sampling tests sensitivity to trade ordering; the rolling WFA above provides the complementary time-and-regime robustness evidence.
Equity Path Simulation
10,000 paths · 1,171 trades resampledMedian Max Drawdown
22.8%
95th pctl: 33.7%
Original Max DD
24.0%
Backtest (single path)
Median Final Multiple
×38.7
5th–95th: ×12.0 – ×127
Original Final Multiple
×38.4
Backtest (single path)
Drawdown Probability
>20%
72.5%
>30%
12.0%
>40%
0.9%
>50%
0.1%
1,171 trades · 10,000 paths · bootstrap with replacement · seeded PRNG for reproducibility